What you make of it
0 up · 0 down
Sign in or make an account to say something. No email needed.
Nothing said here yet.
0 up · 0 down
0 comments
Counted here, by people who signed in.
What people here think, part by part. Totals for a part appear once 3 people have voted on it.
Log in to vote.
Detectors run against this video. Each result is one detector's estimate, shown on its own.
Text detector (desklib)
Not run yet.
An open model (desklib/ai-text-detector-v1.01, MIT licence) that estimates how likely writing is to be AI-generated. It reads the captions and the description; titles are too short to judge. It was trained on written text such as news, reviews and essays rather than speech transcripts, and on AI models older than today's, so results on captions are experimental. Runs on offrecord's own hardware. Model details
Log in to request checks.
6984 views
0 likes · 13 dislikes
YouTube shows no "How this was made" label. Its labels only cover some content, so that isn't proof no AI was used.
Label checked 7 Nov 2026
Not archived
Dislikes are estimates from Return YouTube Dislike, since YouTube removed the count in 2021. None of those comments could say the video was bad. The archive link holds the page, not the video — and YouTube pages archive badly: comments load after the page does, so a snapshot may show none, or show some belonging to a different video entirely. Treat it as a record that the video existed, nothing more.
0 think it should exist off Google · 0 say they hold a copy
Google holds the only copy of most of this. These counts say who thinks that's a problem, and who has done something about it. Self-reported and unverified — nothing is stored but the count, who claimed what is never shown, and pressing again withdraws it.
Not archived
Whoever runs this server can edit the comments and counts above. A copy at the Internet Archive cannot be edited by anyone here.